David Cho-Lerat wrote: > >Google returns: > >http://superuser.com/questions/289678/du-vs-df-output
I will also mention the GNU faq entry for it. Perhaps then it will rank higher in the search engine space. :-) http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/#df-and-du-report-different-information > smbd 2926 root 2w REG 254,1 2665 > 65406 /var/log/samba/log.smbd.1 (deleted) > smbd 2926 root 6w REG 254,1 2665 > 65406 /var/log/samba/log.smbd.1 (deleted) > proftpd 14060 nobody 7w REG 254,1 2807896675 > 49066 /var/log/proftpd/proftpd-trace.log (deleted) > ... > Yes ! Looks like they just need to restart the ProFTPD and Samba > services to free up around 2.7G ! When I want to free up disk space used in a log file instead of removing the file, which creates the above situation of large files that no longer have a directory entry, instead of removing the file I truncate it. $ : > somelargefile By truncating the file it is immediately reduced and the disk blocks freed. The file isn't removed and therefore won't be lost from the filesystem where du can't find it anymore. Any daemon that is still writing to the file will still keep its file handle to it and will continue to write to the file. Bob
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature