On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 15:43:41 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > Camaleón wrote: >> But it seems the problem remains (read comment #45) so dunno why it was >> archived with apparently no additional clues on the current status: > > This was the message that closed it. It was sent to 617940-done and so > the bug was marked as closed. The other bug was forcibly merged with > this one and so it was closed too. > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617940#26
(...) Yes, but regardless the bug status (closed or archived) the issue persists as reported later: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=33;bug=617940 Or is that I am wrongly reading the "notfixed 617940 2:1.0~rc3 +svn20090426-2" tag? Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k1vn2q$tli$1...@ger.gmane.org
