> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Bannister [mailto:cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz] > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:56 PM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Debian 7 > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 08:51:17PM +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org > wrote: > > Some people will say that unstable is better for security issues, > > because it is harder to exploit flaws when the software changes > > constantly. > > Really??? They obviously don't understand the meaning of stable. (Hint, > it doesn't mean unlikely to crash.)
It has two meanings for us, and one determines which is meant by context. Fixes tend to make it into Sid faster than Testing, but I judge Sid and Stable to be different in approach but both about equally decent for security. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/000301ce1186$a1985d10$e4c91730$@allums.com
