> On 29/03/13 23:31, sirquij...@lavabit.com wrote: >>>> despite the implication of the names, you may find either to be (mostly) stable and useful, especially if old software is your only trouble with Debian squeeze. >>> Yeah, if it weren't for the older packages, I'd be content. >>> How do I migrate to testing or unstable: does it require a re-install or >>> do I just add those lists to apt-get? >> nvm, the Debian wiki actually covers this pretty well. >> Thanks for the help. :) > > Make sure you follow the install/upgrade notes carefully when upgrading from Squeeze to Wheezy/Testing. There are some steps that have to be done in the right order (upgrading udev and kernel, for a start), or you will end up with an unusable system. > > It is certainly worth moving to Wheezy, as it will replace Squeeze as Stable in the very near future. > > -- > Dom
It transpires that Netatalk hasn't reached v3 in sid yet, and the good folks on the Netatalk mailing list tell me it's highly recommended, so I think I'll just stick with Squeeze and compile Netatalk 3 myself. Responses and patience much appreciated :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/14224.82.44.24.160.1364765197.squir...@lavabit.com
