On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 13:35 -0700, Weaver wrote: > So! > Are we saying that the policy by which devs are included into core > function needs looking at, from a Q.A. viewpoint? > Do we even have one? > If not, this may very well be a good place to start.
I'm against Quality Assurance, IMO Linux needs an intelligence service and agents with the licence to kill (LTK v1.0), no GNU GPL and no BSD beer licences anymore. The FSF needs a defence of the constitution and an army. And the community needs a leader, ideal would be somebody with a beard. We should test suspect people. It's said that Windows folks can't be drown, so we should tie up those people and throw them into a river. If they should drown, they are innocent and they will wake up in the fields of Elysium were 72 virgin penguins are already waiting. To be honest, in reality they aren't 72 virgin penguins, but 72 virgin women dressed up like Beastie. I'm not kidding. You know why Debian has got a BSD port? It's a sexism conspiracy, the next step will be that Beastie the BSD mascot will replace Tux and all female *nix users must wear Beastie wear. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1365455880.869.27.camel@archlinux