Hello John Try to do read test on the sender, if you don't find any read problem try to do a transfer using ftp
Thanks 2013/4/12 John Elliot <johnellio...@hotmail.com> > Thanks for the reply: > > ss results (wget in "bad" direction): > > "Receiver" - Recv and Send does not change from "0": > ESTAB 0 0 > 192.168.123.1:32815 > 192.168.123.2:www > > "Sender" - snapshots below: > State Recv-Q Send-Q Local > Address:Port Peer > Address:Port > ESTAB 0 505352 > 192.168.123.2:www > 192.168.123.1:32816 > > ESTAB 0 522728 > 192.168.123.2:www > 192.168.123.1:32816 > > ESTAB 0 328696 > 192.168.123.2:www > 192.168.123.1:32816 > > In the other direction: > > Reciever: > ESTAB 0 0 192.168.123.2:33036 192.168.123.1: > www > > Sender: > ESTAB 0 535760 ::ffff:192.168.123.1:www ::ffff: > 192.168.123.2:33038 > ESTAB 0 383720 ::ffff:192.168.123.1:www ::ffff: > 192.168.123.2:33038 > ESTAB 0 474944 ::ffff:192.168.123.1:www ::ffff: > 192.168.123.2:33038 > > > > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:06:38 +0200 > > Subject: Re: iperf / ftp / http TCP poor performance in one direction (UDP > good) > From: emi2f...@gmail.com > To: johnellio...@hotmail.com > CC: mtzgu...@gmail.com; debian-user@lists.debian.org > > > Hello > > Maybe it can the the disks write speed, anayway you can use netstat or ss > look for Recv-Q Send-Q columns > > > 2013/4/12 John Elliot <johnellio...@hotmail.com> > > Thanks again for your help with this. > > I've run 500 pings (-c 500 -i 0) in both directions, and got zero loss. > > Ill try running tcpdump on both servers, and re-testing to check the > segments. > > Swapping the servers would be extremely difficult ;) (They are over > 1000k's apart, and one is in an unmanned(majority of the time) data > centre. > > > > > > From: mtzgu...@gmail.com > > Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 01:38:40 -0300 > > Subject: Re: iperf / ftp / http TCP poor performance in one direction > (UDP good) > > To: johnellio...@hotmail.com > > CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Guido Martínez <mtzgu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Did you check if A acknowledges every received segment? > > Sorry, what I meant by this is if every sent segment from B reaches A. > > You can run an instance of wireshark on each host to check this. > > Basically you need to check for packet loss at high speeds (ping could > > be of use if you set the interval to 0). > > > > TCP Dup ACKs are likely caused by packet loss. > > TCP segment of a reassembled PDU is something Wireshark adds since it > > interprets a bit about application layer protocols, and I think it's > > not a reason to worry (I could have understood this wrong, I just > > looked it up). > > > > If it's easy, you could also try swapping the location of the hosts, > > to see if the problem is on the hosts, or on the link. > > > > Hope it helps and post more info if you find any. > > Guido > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/CA++DQUnEPW=oEAHY02MPSXihm-FpoAC3ddYOA0+m=vk...@mail.gmail.com<http://lists.debian.org/CA++DQUnEPW=oEAHY02MPSXihm-FpoAC3ddYOA0+m=VkeQg%40mail.gmail.com> > > > > > > > -- > esta es mi vida e me la vivo hasta que dios quiera > -- esta es mi vida e me la vivo hasta que dios quiera
