On 2013-05-23 18:59 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > I made my minds about wheezy-backports now for a long time, and allow me, to > open this discussion. > > Pleae correct me, if I am wrong: IMO wheezy-backports is the successor to > debian-volatile
No, it's not. Please read http://backports.debian.org/. > and is intended for use of debian/stable users (aka wheezy at > the moment). As far as I read, packages in wheezy-backports are put into, > when > the environment of those is chenged and a higher (and newer version) is > needed. As an example I want to name here clamav (which needs a newer > version, > when the virus-database is being updated, some chatprograms like yahoo, ehen > a > new protocol must be used or new protocols have to be used, but package > versions in wheezy do not support them). This is what wheezy-updates is for. Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/txlty5e4....@turtle.gmx.de
