Sharon Kimble <skimbl...@gmail.com> writes: > On 22 July 2013 04:45, Carl Johnson <ca...@peak.org> wrote: > >> William Hopkins <we.hopk...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > On 07/20/13 at 08:43pm, Carl Johnson wrote: >> >> Does anybody know what is going on with grub in testing? I have been >> >> waiting for 2.00, but it seems to be stuck at 1.99. Grub-common at >> >> http://packages.debian.org/jessie/grub-common shows that it is at >> >> 1.99-27+deb7u1, but the source files show 2.00-14. The qa page at >> >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/grub2.html shows that 2.00-14 was >> >> migrated to testing on 2013-06-14, so there appear to be some >> >> inconsistancies. >> >> >> > >> > No idea. Maybe ask debian-dev? >> >> Thanks for the suggestion, I sent in the message to debian-devel. I >> will summarize responses in a follow-up to my original message. >> >> When I saw this I checked my grub situation as I knew that I was running > grub2 from seeing it displayed when I rebooted. 'grub2' is not installed, > as shown by 'apt-cache policy' whereas 'grub2-common' is. Maybe its the > same in your case? 'grub2' is just a dummy package.
I was actually using grub2 generically since it is split into so many parts, but I am not actually using grub2. I have seen one reponse from debian-devel that grub2-common 2.00 has not actually been released to testing, so the automatically generated notice was an error. Thanks for the response, and sorry for the confusion. -- Carl Johnson ca...@peak.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87siz64mf7.fsf@oak.localnet