On Wednesday 28 Aug 2013, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > > Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > >> David Goodenough wrote: > >>> I have a sacrificial machine that I keep upto date with sid every > >>> morning. Yesterday and today I get an error:- > >>> > >>> Calculating upgrade... Failed > >>> > >>> The following packages have unmet dependencies: > >>> libenchant1c2a : Depends: aspell-en but it is not going to be > >>> > >>> installed or > >>> > >>> myspell-dictionary or > >>> aspell-dictionary or > >>> ispell-dictionary or > >>> hunspell-dictionary > >>> > >>> Recommends: enchant but it is not going to be > >>> > >>> installed > >>> E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be > >>> caused by held packages. > >>> Reading package lists... Done > >>> Building dependency tree But apt-cache policy libenchant1c2a says:- > >>> > >>> Installed: 1.6.0-10 > >>> Candidate: 1.6.0-10 > >>> > >>> so it should not need upgrading at all. > >>> > >>> Also aspell-en is installed. > >>> > >>> Is this related to Ubuntu bug #1096669? There is nothing in > >>> bugs.debian.org > >>> that seems to fit the bill. > >>> > >>> Any ideas? > >> > >> I get that with dist-upgrade and not with upgrade. Googling the error > >> it seems that doing upgrade will resolve that. But I haven't tried that! > > > > when I do 'aptitude why' on that file, I get that it is a dependency of > > k3b, which is part of the upgrade. What happens if you do 'why'? > > see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721130 > > Hugo I am using apt-get not aptitude, and I don't think apt-get has a why option. But I will follow the bug with interest.
Thanks David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201308281907.51599.david.goodeno...@btconnect.com