On 2013-10-07, Chris Bannister <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
>> 
>> Maybe he thought that given the apt script is run before the logrotate
>> script in cron.daily (if indeed they're handled in alphabetical order?
>> (apparently, yes, they're run in 'lexical sort order' order according to
>> the run-parts man page)), if the apt script hung for any reason, the
>> logrotate script would never get past the bottleneck, thus "explaining"
   ****************
   should have 'run-parts'

Anyhow, it's a vain _hypothesis_

 a proposal intended to explain certain facts or
 observations


>> his problem.
>
> Remember what Benny Hill said:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6jaKkE0RsI

but not an assumption

  a statement that is assumed to be true and from which a
  conclusion can be drawn;

  a hypothesis that is taken for granted
  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnl55951.2gs.cu...@einstein.electron.org

Reply via email to