Curt: > On 2013-10-09, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org <berenger.mo...@neutralite.org> > wrote: >>> >>> - How do I plan to access mails using mutt (IMAP or local storage?) >> >> IMAP. Local storage is probably nice for some uses, but I'll be honest: >> I can not see the interest of reading all my mails without Internet >> access. I do not say there are no uses for that, simply, they are not my >> uses. >> > What use do you find for an MTA if you're using IMAP?
SMTP is still the most common way to send e-mails (even if the user
doesn't see it). Some IMAP servers can send e-mails on their users'
behalf when mails are save into a special folder, but not all servers do
that.
> As far as having multiple smart hosts, alpine (my mail client) handles
> that with "roles" easily enough. I'm sure (well, I'm optimistic) Mutt
> can do the same thing.
There are solutions, but they are not really nice.
J.
--
I spend money without thinking on products and clothes that I believe
will enhance my social standing.
[Agree] [Disagree]
<http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
