On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 03:10:31PM +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: > As simple Debian users, we indeed do not mind about portability > stuff. But for Debian's maintainers, using systemd as default means > that they'll have to maintain other systems for Debian Hurd and > Debian KFreeBSD.
Debian Hurd is not a release architecture so the project is not hobbled by its requirements (yet). That's certainly the case for KFreeBSD, so long as it remains a release architecture for jessie. Quite separately from the init discussion, I believe some of my fellow developers have concerns regarding its readiness (and did so for wheezy too). > But, indeed, almost nobody mind about that, because linux is > probably the most used kernel in free software world, and not with a > small difference. Linux is like the windows of free software world > (in term of adoption, not about other aspects). Yes, in Debian the amd64 variant of the Linux kernel is more popular than the two KFreeBSD variants combined by a very large margin. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131105143210.ge28...@bryant.redmars.org