-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 05:14:50PM -0700, Tom wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 05:09:53PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > Why would anybody want to use UPnP? Wonderfully insecure... > > I was hoping the open source community might have done it right.
My Scout troop has a saying, "There's no point trying to shine shit. You only get dirty and it doesn't get cleaner." This is one of those moments: The concept is fundamentally flawed, not necissaraly the implementation. - -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : `. `'` proud Debian admin and user `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQE/mxLjUzgNqloQMwcRAtwHAJjZrEJALaN6mU+6PFbo/ORql2VEAJ0Yg9mP OmGT2obhjRKLAInX6fMU0A== =vdy/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]