Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 18:18:29 +0900 From: Osamu Aoki <osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com> > ??? Why bother with qpopper. It is a local mbox.
Ideally the one mbox should work, but I'm not sure that the MUA and getmail will each respect access by the other. qpopper will respect getmail in access to the mbox and respond to the MUA with POP3. This at the cost of a second mbox and delays up to the retrieval interval of qpopper. Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 07:54:08 +0000 From: <art.is...@yandex.ru> > I'am using popa3d (Tiny POP3 daemon, designed with security as the > primary goal) and stunnel for SSL on server-side ... Thanks. Stunnel appears to be the right answer here. The example in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stunnel with substitution of POP3 for SMTP, is exactly the scenario I've described. Further, the SMTP example allows the MUA to submit to the remote mail server directly rather than through exim4 on localhost. The whole setup is simpler with Stunnel. From: Martin Steigerwald <mar...@lichtvoll.de> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:24:16 +0100 > Move to a MUA which can do SSL/TLS. If Stunnel fails I'll consider that. Thanks to everyone for all the feedback, ... Peter E. -- 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12 Tel +1 360 639 0202 http://carnot.yi.org/ **** New address Bcc: peter at easthope. ca **** -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1W73VF-0005jk-Cw@dalton.invalid