On 02/03/14 12:26, ghaverla wrote: > On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 01:28:38 +0100 > Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net> wrote: > >> We Arch users made a poll. Even if more users would have been against >> systemd, the developers would have switched to systemd, but most users >> wanted systemd. We, around 49% and me were against systemd, but around >> 51 % were pro systemd. Nowadays it makes live easier for all of us who >> use several different distros, when _all_ or at least the most >> important distros will switch to systemd. To discuss pros and cons of >> systemd a time machine is needed, to go back more than 3 years ago. >> To discuss it in 2014 is a little bit to late. > <snipped>
> Hence, I (not the person who started this thread) couldn't have engaged > in debate 3+ years ago either. If you were a Debian developer you would have been made aware of systemd. If you were a Debian developer you'd have been able to participate in a relevant debate. Debian users debating the issue is about as effective as us debating gravity - it might make us feel our opinions are validated but has no effect on reality. > I disagree with the binaryness of > systemd. Do you mean the *one* binary in systemd? I'm pretty sure the source is available. > > But knowing Debian was going to change, I went looking for refuge, and > things derived from Gentoo might be home, things derived from Slackware > might be home. Choice is good. Fortunately it's one of the key benefits of Open Source development. <snipped> Kind regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5312c777.3060...@gmail.com
