On 19/04/2014 12:21 AM, Oliver Fairhall wrote: > On 17/04/14 10:13, Scott Ferguson wrote: >> The "presumption" was made that the majority of readers, including the >> OP, would have the basic intelligence necessary to differentiate between >> the instructions to use "the latest java package" and an *example* using >> "an example version". >> ... >> Regards. > > It's all good mate, I got the idea. Your instructions really were useful > for me, and having the 'example' specified for an older version is not > an issue at all, imo.
Yes, fair enough from me too, sorry for the noise. Sometimes though, it helps when there is a chance that something so simple would be missed by someone ... anyone, to just point out a potential problem /may/ or /may not/ have helped. Cheers A. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/535182fe.8020...@affinityvision.com.au
