Le 19/05/2014 13:20, Jerry Stuckle a écrit : > On 5/19/2014 6:08 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >> On 5/19/14, Richard Hector <rich...@walnut.gen.nz> wrote: >>> On 19/05/14 20:43, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >>>>>> A more relevant request: how about an example of a digital (or any) >>>>>> recording that was released _with_DRM_ for which the copyright >>>>>> has now >>>>>> lapsed? >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mickey_mouse_law >>> >>> Isn't that the reverse? Mickey Mouse, when first released was not >>> subject to DRM, and copyright (due to the above law) has not lapsed. >> >> Yes. Exactly. And the point being, the copyright moguls achieve >> endless extensions due to their parliamentary $ influence, so there's >> a good chance you will never get such an example as the one you ask >> for - due to ever-increasing copyright extensions. >> >> At least, in the good ole U.S of A. >> >> > > Whether you like it or not, that is the law. Period. > > Jerry > >
1) One can say that one disapprove a law, it's called democracy 2) When lawmakers are paid to orient what they do this is usually called corruption. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5379ed77.7040...@rail.eu.org
