On Lu, 09 iun 14, 08:22:51, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 17:48 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 08:31:34PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > > > In this case "systemd" likely is for udev, wich usually also is used > > > without systemd, but it's merged by upstream. Just a guess > > > > NO it isn't merged!!! Please stop spreading FUD! > > https://lwn.net/Articles/490413/ > https://www.archlinux.org/news/systemd-tools-replaces-udev/
Quote from the first link:
The udev built from the systemd source tree will stay compatible
with non-systemd init systems for a long time. This change is mostly
a detail of the build scheme, rather than a change of direction or
interfaces. Accordingly, the libudev API is untouched by these build
infrastructure changes. For us, compatibility is key.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
