On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:55:22 +0100 Jonathan Dowland <j...@debian.org> wrote:
> Packages in the archive with a "+bN" version suffix, such as "+b1", have be > 'binNMUd': essentially rebuilt without any source changes because the > environment has changed (such as a version bump of a library dependency). Ah! Thank you! "binNMU" is the magic word. Found the following in google: https://wiki.debian.org/binNMU http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/precise/man1/sbuild.1.html So I would have to install/learn "sbuild". > In your case it would be worthwhile documenting the fact your package diffe > from the archive anyway; so I'd recommend just adding a new changelog stanz I was wrong, it turns out that binNMUs _do_ (usually) add a changelog entry, but it's a sort of ephemeral entry (e.g. the changelog entry for 2.12-1+b2 won't show in the changelog for 2.12-2 because it doesn't go into the source package) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140707145140.2989d838.debian-users-l...@brisammon.fastmail.fm
