Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2014, 13:19:21 schrieb The Wanderer: > On 07/18/2014 12:56 PM, Slavko wrote: > > Ahoj, > > > > Dňa Fri, 18 Jul 2014 18:10:58 +0200 Erwan David <er...@rail.eu.org> > > > > napísal: > >> That's quite afalse this... count every package which depends > >> direectly or indirectly on systemd, often without real need... > > > > If you can decide this (i an not able this), please fill bugreport > > about unneeded dependency against this (these) package(s). > > I think (not having done the research to verify this) that the idea is > that some - many? - packages need PAM, and depend (perhaps indirectly) > on an appropriate package for that, but that package now depends > (perhaps indirectly) on libpam-systemd, which depends on 'systemd-sysv | > systemd-shim', which results in systemd-sysv getting installed without > notice, even though the original package didn't need systemd in the > first place.
Look here: Debian Bug report logs - #754984 libpam-systemd: re-add alternative dependency on systemd-shim https://bugs.debian.org/754984 Was linked from the other bug report I mentioned. Ciao, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2913888.5ck2lig82g@merkaba