On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:58 AM, <berenger.mo...@neutralite.org> wrote: > Le 21.07.2014 15:31, Slavko a écrit : >> >> it seems, that there can good idea to provide separate ML for testing >> users. > > I agree, since testing is not for normal users (well... theoretically at > least), so we could imagine that different MLs for (beta-)testing and > productive usage (questions about "how to do..." and stable related bugs > would go there, I guess). > Now, I have no idea about the complexity of maintaining a new ML. Maybe > there are also problems because some issues can not clearly affect only one > of both testing and stable?
There is one https://lists.debian.org/debian-testing/ but a quick look at the its archives shows that it isn't a heavily used list and that it's not a list for freaking out about systemd. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=SwzmN_Wrh9UUvn4SwfprT6cbRt+myBfrCf12Dq8g+X9=g...@mail.gmail.com
