On Mon 28 Jul 2014 at 17:37:19 +0200, Slavko wrote: > Dňa Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:56:40 +0100 Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> > napísal: > > > How does the server tell the difference between talking to another > > server (which is acting as client) and what you call a "client"?
[RFC abstracts snipped. Thanks for them. I'll get round to reading in detail later] > As client i consider the MUA, but e.g. exim has a "client mode" too (i > don't know about other MTAs). I am sorry for simplification. No need to be sorry. The simplification was fine. It's just that here mutt and other MUAs connect to exim for direct mail delivery. I wanted to clarify that servers can also be clients. > I want to point, that for end users is intended the 587 port, as > mentioned someone other too, and IMO it is not a good opinion to > suggest to try (check) the port 25, if the 587 is provided. Another > goal is, that there are some ISP, which don't blocks/redirects/proxies > the 587 port yet ;-) brian@desktop:~$ nmap -Pn mail.o2.co.uk Starting Nmap 6.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-07-28 18:30 BST Nmap scan report for mail.o2.co.uk (82.132.141.69) Host is up (0.047s latency). Not shown: 998 filtered ports PORT STATE SERVICE 25/tcp open smtp 110/tcp open pop3 Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 7.61 seconds Whether they direct all outgoing port 25 trafic to their own server I do not know. Your observation that ISPs could also interfere with port 587 doesn't cheer me up. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/28072014182232.527daac4e...@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk