On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 08:10:17AM +0200, Mart van de Wege wrote: > Steve Litt <sl...@troubleshooters.com> writes: > > > On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:49:52 +0200 > > Mart van de Wege <mvdw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Steve Litt <sl...@troubleshooters.com> writes: > >> > >> > > >> > And last but not least is the alternative of holding your nose and > >> > using systemd. If I go that route, the first thing I'm going to do > >> > is remove daemons from systemd's control and move them to > >> > Daemontools. As a matter of fact, I've created a cron replacement > >> > in Python, which tonight I'm going to daemonize using Daemontools. > >> > I'm getting a lot of Daemontools practice, because no matter what > >> > my init, Daemontools might end up being a better alternative for > >> > most of my daemons. > >> > > >> I really don't get this. In your distaste for systemd you end up > >> reimplenting it with twine and baling wire. This is not logical, > >> rational disagreement, this is cutting off your nose to spite your > >> face. > > > > A) Twine and baling wire is better than monolithic entanglement. > > Yeah, after this I'm really not going to take you seriously anymore. > > > > B) If you try Daemontools, you just might switch your view of which is > > twine and baling wire, > > Yeah, mixing sysvinit and daemontools, especially if you only do this to > try and duplicate systemd features, is twine and baling wire. You might > want to check your assumptions, you don't know what I use at > work. Here's a hint: I'm a sysadmin.
Strangely, I've been using sysvinit and daemontools on Debian for years and years. At work. To run services that handle hundreds of millions of dollars of other people's money. I'm a sysadmin, too. -dsr- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140918143257.gt13...@randomstring.org