-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 14/10/2014 4:24 AM, Curt wrote: > On 2014-10-13, Miles Fidelman <mfidel...@meetinghouse.net> wrote: >> >> I'm really curious to know how many others here have come to a similar >> conclusion, and what folks are looking at (in my case, SmartOS is >> looking better and better). > > Oh shit.
?? I looked at SmartOS [1] last year, it wasn't ready for my needs then. I would be interested to know where it is at now as I may consider it too. Also, I've sent a request to the debian-bsd list to try and get some answers on the viability of using kFreeBSD going forward -- that is the "kFreeBSD future" [2] titled thread. My latest post to this thread is too new to give a direct link yet as I just posted about 7 minutes ago. My preferences, for possible least change, would be to go with kFreeBSD, but only if it is going to be around and not become a dead project. However, if SmartOS is now ready for real prime time production use, then I'll certainly consider it. Thanks A. [1] http://smartos.org/ [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2014/09/msg00280.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iF4EAREIAAYFAlQ8Fl8ACgkQqBZry7fv4vv3xQD+M0wgAOc2owDpkAKflCXwYMie T/XNn7Hr0yL7XzBb2RcBAKq1rFlnUkww6s3lvLDqaIHC8E/3RIpjJwpJwjKuJhpu =Kt8l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/543c1664.5080...@affinityvision.com.au