On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 17:33:02 +0200 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <o...@debian.org> wrote:
> I really don't buy the argument that "the GR proposal was too quiet > to be noticed by 6+ people". I mean: the proposition happened to be > in the middle of the post-TC decision wave, on the mailing lists > where it belonged. The people who cared about the whole "default init > for Debian" question _were_ following and contributing to these > various lists. I'm therefore claiming that the people who missed the > GR proposal were not sufficiently interested (otherwise they would've > been subscribed to either -vote or -project, where these proposals > belong). I'm also thankful that the proposer limited his proposal to > these lists (I'd have considered a spread of the call over -devel, > -user or other lists an abuse). > > Le lundi, 13 octobre 2014, 16.15:02 Ian Jackson a écrit : > > If four other DDs send me and Matthew Vernon private email to say > > that they would support a GR on this subject, I will restart this > > conversation on -project. > > Doing this now despite the fact that the GR didn't reach its 6 > seconds, 7 months ago, will lead to an incredibly bigger waste of > time, just when we're about to freeze testing. > > The GR train passed… So what do you suggest instead? SteveT Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141013143754.7880d...@mydesq2.domain.cxm
