On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:45:03 +0200 Anders Wegge Keller <we...@wegge.dk> wrote:
> It seems that there's a lot of controversy about the > SysV-replacement that should not be named. Most, if not all of the > arguments for, as well as against seem to be of a philosophical, > rather than stringent technichnical nature. As such, they are > probably not suited for this list. The preceding sentence is not at all true. If Red Hat is using Debian as its proxy in monopolizing Linux, and morphing Linux into something completely different, this is the business of rank and file Debian users. > So my question as a relative > newcomer to the Debian ecosystem is if there is an -advocacy list, > where the philosophical differences can be beaten into the ground, > while keeping this list at a more factual level? You're not the first to propose such divide and conquer. Without a lot of stringent moderation, it's not going to work. > If not, where do I propose the creation of such a list? It already exists: http://www.freelists.org/archive/modular-debian/ You can subscribe at http://www.freelists.org/list/modular-debian Posting there does not preclude expressing systemd displeasure here. SteveT Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141013145849.11cb9...@mydesq2.domain.cxm