On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:01:44PM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > On 10/17/2014 at 12:38 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: > > > On 10/17/2014 12:21 PM, Steve Litt <sl...@troubleshooters.com> > > wrote: > > >> Thank you Ian, and the seconders, and everyone who is speaking up > >> for (what I call) sanity. > > > > Still only 4 seconds though... > > Eh? > > I see at least 8 seconds so far, even if we ignore one which may not > have had a valid cryptographic signature (which may or may not have been > re-submitted privately), and one from a person with a n...@debian.org > E-mail address. Plus there's still at least one person whom I would > expect to support such a GR who has recently posted to debian-vote, but > who has not yet (publicly) posted a seconding. > > The secretary has stated that the required number of seconds have been > reached, and has created a page to track the GR proposal, including > proposed alternative resolutions and revisions to the proposed text of > either the original resolution or any proposed alternative. >
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/10/msg00012.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/10/msg00044.html Thank you very much for caring. I cannot believe some people still thinks this is just a minor issue and that we should simply stick with the TC's authority regardless what.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
