On 25/10/14 12:36, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Vi, 24 oct 14, 14:24:31, Peter Nieman wrote:
And there should be ethical considerations, e. g. to not expose the users by
default to software that due to its complexity and technical characteristics
might facilitate intrusion and spying.
Dam'it, we must get rid of X.
1. X isn't an init system, it's not running as PID 1 and is not
essential on a Debian machine.
2. As far as I know, X developers never openly declared their intention
to transform Linux into an entirely different OS and radically change
the way every distribution works.
3. There's no alternative to X so far, but there are several
alternatives to systemd, and one of them has worked perfectly well for
most people until the present day.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/m2gce6$79m$1...@ger.gmane.org
