Le mardi, 18 novembre 2014, 22.10:22 Miles Fidelman a écrit : > Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > Let's take the inverse view: which of these use the upstream > > sysvinit scripts directly ? The answer, as demonstrated below, is: > > none. > > Out of curiosity, how are you comparing these to the init scripts that > are generated by making the upstream source?
I was not comparing, I was checking which debian/ folders (aka Debian packaging) would contain init scripts, which are then installed in the binary packages as /etc/init.d/package (see dh_installinit). > At the very least, would not the appropriate references be.... > (changelogs) > (…) > or a diff between the upstream source and the script in the Debian > package The content of the debian/ directory in an unpacked Debian source package is exactly that (which is what sources.debian.net shows), hence my references. > the in depth analysis would be how many additional changes had to be > added to accommodate any incompatibilities between sysvinit scripts > and systemd's handling of said scripts I'm ready to place a bet that more changes were made in these scripts by the introduction of insserv and mandatory LSB headers than by making sure they work fine when run by systemd. Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1904407.p3R537Cgjt@gyllingar