On 11/22/2014 06:43 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 22/11/14 22:14, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 21:46:19 +1100
Scott Ferguson <scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com> wrote:
It lost. Developers are not being forced to do what they don't want.
The winner was "developers will work it out themselves" i.e. Debian won.
Another reading being "The Developpers won, Debian lost"...
Only reads that way if you have trouble reading - or simple refuse to
acknowledge the view of Debian.
Did I miss something?
Option 1: init policy stands *won by default* [1]
Option 2: change init policy *LOST*
Option 3: ask nicely to follow init policy *lost*
Option 4: policy stands, no statement needed *WON*
Option 5: null option, further discussion *won by default*
[1] depending on bug status of package dependence on PID 1, so maybe
this is the real issue
The good new is there's an explanation for those that can't read:-
http://blog.halon.org.uk/2014/11/barbie-the-debian-developer/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=barbie-the-debian-developer
Cheers,
Ron.
Kind regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54726946.7050...@ix.netcom.com
