On 12/13/2014 12:26 PM, Curt wrote:
On 2014-12-13, Jape Person <jap...@comcast.net> wrote:

Would anyone happen to know if plans are afoot to eliminate use of
/forcefsck?


I haven't the slightest idea, but I read somewhere recently that it
might be preferable to go the kernel parameter route, which avoids
writing to a potentially corrupted file system.



I hadn't considered that. It certainly makes sense. Writing to a file system that you're checking to be sure it's not corrupted is actually kind of a weird thing to do, isn't it?

That actually makes a point about current standards and practices not necessarily making sense -- even if they are what we're accustomed to using.

JP


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/548c849c.7030...@comcast.net

Reply via email to