On Friday 17 April 2015 15:51:23 The Wanderer wrote: > On 04/17/2015 at 10:18 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Friday 17 April 2015 15:08:13 The Wanderer wrote: > > A valid point. But changing code name reduces the risk of > > absentmindedly upgrading and then thinking oops. Particularly in the > > case of the OP, who expected changing Jessie to testing now, to have > > some impact and be a valid test of the result of tracking testing. > > I'm not sure he was. I understood his reluctance to test "for fear of > causing immediate problems" as being based on the idea that "if I > converted it wrong, or to the wrong thing, then trying to use the result > might cause problems" - not on the idea that testing currently contains > something different from jessie.
He was discussing changing all his sources to testing in order to track testing not Jessie. He said: "Running `aptitude update' with the changes" (from Jessie to testing) "in place does not produce any output that looks problematice (to me). But maybe that is not a thorough test?" Having the changes in place would make no difference at all at the moment. So it is not a test at all. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/201504171641.45413.lisi.re...@gmail.com