On Mon, May 11, 2015, at 12:36, Renaud OLGIATI wrote: > On Mon, 11 May 2015 11:50:41 -0300 > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[email protected]> wrote: > > In that sense, ext2 is not nearly as good a choice as it once was. A > > newly created ext3 with default parameters (yes, that means it gets a > > journal -- that's how it gets most use and most testing) is a better bet > > nowadays as far as present and future reliability goes. > > What is the pint of a journal for a fs that does not change outside of > system upgrades ?
It is not about the filesystem, it is about the reliability of the kernel code that implements it. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[email protected]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1431439697.2964682.266725225.1b791...@webmail.messagingengine.com
