On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 03:28:30PM -0900, Greg Madden wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sunday 09 November 2003 02:55 pm, stan wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 04:52:25PM +0100, Nicos Gollan wrote: > > > On Sunday 09 November 2003 16:32, stan wrote: > > > > I have several "testing" machines, when I try to do apt-get > > > > dist-upgrade on them, they want to remove kde-base. > > > > > > > > This seems like a bad idea :-) > > > > > > Not really as long as kdebase is the only package to be removed. > > > It's just a metapackage for easier installation of a whole lot of > > > KDE components without any own functionality. > > > > Well, actually I just picked kdebase as the obvious one. Here's the > > full story: > > > > Calculating Upgrade... Done > > The following packages will be REMOVED: > > ark kab karm kate kcalc kcharselect kchart kcoloredit kcron kdebase > > kdebase-libs kdepasswd kdf kdict kdm kedit kfind kformula kfract > > kghostview khexedit kiconedit kit kivio kjots kmail knewsticker knode > > knotes koffice koffice-libs konqueror konsole kontour korn koshell > > kpackage kpaint kpm kpresenter kruler kscreensaver ksirc ksnapshot > > kspread ksysv ktimer kugar kuser kview kword libarts libkdenetwork1 > > libkmid libkonq3 libvorbis0 secpolicy xmmsarts > > > > That looks pretty bad to me. > > > > Am I mistaken? > > It depends, do you have KDE 2.x installed, or some other backport ? If > so KDE 3 went into testing about a week ago and will replace any > existing KDE install. I don't know why it wants to remove as opposed to > upgrade, not enough info.
Pure box stock Debain, no odd backports, or anything. What addtioanl info can I provide? -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]