-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:28:11AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote: > On 08/21/2015 12:29 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > >what do the log files say? Best is if you look at them (1) just > >after having restarted Apache. The error log should contain > >possible warnings about misconfiguration, etc. (2) after having > >tried an access. The access log should at least show the attempt, > >perhaps the error log has more info. There's a way to crank up the > >log verbosity, if necessary. [1] > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_web_hosting_service#Name-based_virtual_hosts > > Since last missive, localhost/redmine produces an error page "Web > application could not be started" > Then Phusion Passenger listed about 10 pages on just about > everything in the system. The first line seems significant. ie > > (<unknown>): did not find expected key while parsing a block mapping at line > 1 column 1 (Psych::SyntaxError)
Something is definitely wrong, but the error message is just too unspecific to give us any clue. But... > > > The rest seems to be a repeat of the apache2 error log. The error > log is listed below. I've highlighted in red and a > the > significant portions. I re-indented the lines a bit (being a bit liberal about line length) > > > [ 2015-08-21 09:44:56.9036 862/7f3e77342740 > agents/HelperAgent/Main.cpp:650 ]: PassengerHelperAgent online, > listening at unix:/tmp/passenger.1.0.855/generation-0/request > [ 2015-08-21 09:44:56.9109 869/7f0a4350d780 > agents/LoggingAgent/Main.cpp:321 ]: PassengerLoggingAgent online, > listening at unix:/tmp/passenger.1.0.855/generation-0/logging > [ 2015-08-21 09:44:56.9110 859/7f547f176740 > agents/Watchdog/Main.cpp:728 ]: All Phusion Passenger agents started! > [Fri Aug 21 09:44:56.964658 2015] [wsgi:warn] [pid 855:tid 140337965688704] > mod_wsgi: Compiled for Python/2.7.8. > [Fri Aug 21 09:44:56.964745 2015] [wsgi:warn] [pid 855:tid 140337965688704] > mod_wsgi: Runtime using Python/2.7.9. This one is probably harmless (just a difference in the minor-minor version). > [Fri Aug 21 09:44:56.965283 2015] [mpm_worker:notice] > [pid 855:tid 140337965688704] AH00292: Apache/2.4.10 (Debian) > Phusion_Passenger/4.0.53 mod_wsgi/4.3.0 Python/2.7.9 configured -- > resuming normal operations > [Fri Aug 21 09:44:56.965301 2015] [core:notice] [pid 855:tid 140337965688704] > AH00094: Command line: '/usr/sbin/apache2' App 4493 stdout: > App 4493 stderr: env: /usr/bin/passenger-config: No such file or > directory > App 4493 stdout: > [ 2015-08-21 10:04:20.7347 862/7f3e7725c700 Pool2/Implementation.cpp:287 ]: > Could not spawn process for application /usr/share/redmine: An error > occured while starting up the preloader. > Error ID: 469d837f Error details saved to: /tmp/passenger-error-m73dnZ.html [rest elided] > I think that the missing /usr/bin/passanger-config file is the root > problem. I tried to symlink the file in but it doesn't seem to have > worked. I'll keep working. [note: you have a typo there (passanger): only important when cutting&pasting] Yes, this seems to me the most promising clue as well. Note that there is a mention of an "error details" file in /tmp/passenger-error-m73dnZ.html. Perhaps there are more clues there. Searching for which Debian packages provide a file named like that [1] points to a package named "passenger". OTOH there's no package named like that [2], but there are two: libapache2-mod-passenger and ruby-passenger (OK, there are more of them, but they are documentation packages). Both of them seem to be installed, judging by the logs. What is the output of "aptitude search passenger"? Alternatively, if you use a graphical package manager (synaptic or similar) what does it say about packages of similar name? What files come with libapache2-mod-passenger? What files with ruby-passenger? (You can find that out in the command line with "dpkg -L ruby-passenger") Which one provides /usr/bin/passenger-config? Try to force-reinstall that one. - - - - - - [1] Here's how I went about that: apt-file search usr/bin/passenger-config (you have to have the apt-file package installed for that, and perhaps do from time to time an "apt-file update") [2] This might well be sign of a packaging error. Regards - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlXYBOAACgkQBcgs9XrR2kaMSQCfU/FLTrnbFW3yE0b09gx8/sSr fEcAniuI40GAhZ6XEsoiqHabH73QMWry =rNVI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
