On Wednesday 09 September 2015 20:31:50 Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Op 09-09-15 om 12:04 schreef Lisi Reisz: > > On Wednesday 09 September 2015 09:34:11 Paul van der Vlis wrote: > >>> Neither of these works with British 4oD or Channel 5. > >> > >> I cannot recieve that here I expect, and I have no URL. So I cannot test > >> it, but I think you are wrong. > > > > How can you possibly have a valid opinion when you can't test it? > > It's my job for the last 15 years.
Since you haven't tried to get Channel 4 at all, it hasn't been your job for even five minutes. > > It is you > > who are wrong. Everyone here, who can in theory get it, has problems on > > Linux, which the channel acknowledges. > > Ah, so it has nothing to do with the choice between flashplayer-mozilla > and flashplugin-nonfree? That was my opinion about. > > Yes, a channel can implement flash in such a bad way, that it's not > possible to look at it normally for Linux users. That is what I had consistently been saying. > > Yes, a channel can implement flash in such a bad way, that it's not > possible to look at it normally for Linux users. Yes, I know. If you look I specifically mentioned two specific channels. They are trying to stop people blocking adverts. The third channel paid for by advertisements is fine on Google Chrome. And if I can get my television to run catch-up on those two channels by running flashplayer-mozilla, however illogical that may seem to you, I shall do so, however experienced in other matters you may be and however much you may disapprove. I would willingly do something else, but the only other thing that has been suggested (elsewhere) is Pipelight, and that too has proved problematic. > > E.g. here: http://www.ookjij.nl/ > But this works: http://www.ookjij.nl/index_win.html > > > Even flashplayer-mozilla is still not working on my husband's desktop. > > flashplayer-mozilla will install the same flashplayer as > flashplugin-nonfree. But there is a big difference between the > flashplayer what't installed in Chromium. Chromium is better in flash. And won't play Channel 4. Nonetheless, flashplayer-mozilla works on my desktop and flashplugin-nonfree doesn't. FOR THIS SPECIFIC CHANNEL. > For security reasons I don't use flash anymore on my work-computer. > What I see there, is that really many sites use HTML5 when there is no > flash available. I think this is because of tablet-computers. On tablets > is no flash available. That is completely irrelevant to my presented problem. Lisi
