On Friday 18 December 2015 15:27:08 David Wright wrote: > On Fri 18 Dec 2015 at 10:32:01 (+0000), Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Friday 18 December 2015 09:49:59 Brian wrote: > > > > > > > > Also, run 'fetchmail --version' for debugging info. > > > > > > The guts of my ~/.fetchmailrc are > > > > > > poll <POP3 server> > > > proto pop3 > > > user <Could be bob or b...@example.com> > > > password <secret> > > > ssl <May or may not be needed. Depends on the server> > > > > > > 'fetchmail -c -v' for testing. > > > > Having just by implication been told by someone that only muggles, lusers > > and/or dinosaurs use POP3, how many others of us will admit to it? (For > > the avoidance of doubt, I use POP3.) > > > > I won't admit to being a muggle or a luser (who, me?), but I am often > > prepared to admit to being a dinosaur. However, in this case I actually > > don't agree with the premise. Feel free to tell me that I am deluding > > myself and that I am indeed a dinosaur in this as well. > > > > I just don't, for my use, like a lot of what IMAP does. > > Not sure what this has to do with "command not found" and, > in particular, "command not found [SOLVED]".
It hasn't. But it is a continuation of the thread and I quoted from a mail in the thread. It does say "was" not "is" in the subject.. But it makes clear I am not hijacking, but splitting the thread. You have removed and not quoted the "was". Lisi > > (In fact, I'm not sure how one could possibly _solve_ > "command not found" in the absence of any more context > in the subject line.)