On Tuesday 09 February 2016 09:25:40 Eike Lantzsch wrote: > Hi Ritesh Raj Sarraf > > Just a thought - my two cents: > > On Tuesday 09 February 2016 12:53:04 Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > Thank you for your response. > > > > Purely selfish. :) > > I want to know about cabling problems. > > > > > Linux pi 4.1.16-v7+ #833 SMP Wed Jan 27 14:32:22 GMT 2016 armv7l > > > GNU/Linux > > > > The source code where i find the message text in my Sid kernel > > is not depending on the CPU architecture. So it is supposed to be > > in effect on your system. > > But i riddle why it does not convert 0x2003 to "FAILED". > > > > > The RPi2 is a USB 2.0 only device. But yes, I think the drive is 3.0 > > > capable. > > Are you copying or moving files from or to your USB-HDD via the network? > RPis share the same USB controller for the network chip and for the > USB-ports. My experience with RPis is that heavy network traffic makes the > I/O over the USB-ports to and from HDDs very shaky. I even lost a HDD that > way. If you want some sort of a NAS then ditch the RPi. You will be better > off with a Cubietruck if you want to stick to ARM-architecture or a > PC-Engines ALIX (i386) or a PC-Engines APU if you prefer amd64 and want > more memory.
I should have mentioned: Cubietruck and APU: connect HDD w/ SATA ALIX: only parallel port for HDD > > All the best > Eike [snip]