On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 13:29:02 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 13:17, Alfredo Valles wrote: > > On Friday 14 November 2003 11:23 pm, Tom wrote: > [snip] > > > That is, the outcome was indeterminate. So anybody else who could > > > have potentially been said to "win" would be equally illegitmate. > > > It kind of sucks when you have a country without a president, > > > > But I heard that there is some evidence of cheating in the elections > > in Florida in favor of the republicans. So you let the cheaters won. > > Good example for your citizens. > > And US citizens here lots of nasty things about Castro. If Castro > isn't that bad, then maybe GWB isn't either? > ..but Castro _is_ bad: He fails his Command and commits Treason, by failing to repress war crime, just like That Other Sissy Based on that island. ;-) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
