I have yet to try xfce since accessibility support from what I've read
to date is very immature compared to mate and gnome possibly as poor as
kde. I have spare hard drives and can try this out and will find out
what happens with xfce a little later this weekend. I'm running
computers not servers on my end so due to technology differences beyond
expanded memory I would suspect server experience to be different than
is the case on computers. How is xfce with memory compared to mate?
On Fri, 1 Apr 2016, jdd wrote:
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 14:19:57
From: jdd <j...@dodin.org>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: running Linux without display
Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:20:14 +0000 (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Le 01/04/2016 17:14, Jude DaShiell a ?crit :
Have you tried installing using orca and when finished how far did you
get when you booted into your newly installed system for the first time?
I usually make a minimal install and then install only what is necessary,
most often xfce. It's often very difficult to completely avoid any X, and X
forwarding is convenient
jdd
--
