On 6/13/2016 11:12 AM, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Le sextidi 26 prairial, an CCXXIV, Tanstaafl a écrit : >> This is why Reply-To-List is the way to reply when engaged in a mailing >> list. >> >> If your client doesn't have this, then maybe it is time to consider >> changing.
> I am not sure what you are aiming at. If "Reply-To-List" is supposed to be a > message header, as the typography, then you can observe that it is not > present in most of the mails on this mailing-list. > > If you are referring to a MUA command, then first let me remind you that MUA > commands are not standardized, Actually, this one pretty much is - it bases its action (or lack) on the existence of the standard mail list headers. Very few mail lists do not have these headers (Yahoo lists are one exception). > The point is that a procedure that requires a moment of > thought for each single mail "I am replying to a mailing-list or a simple > group discussion" is not acceptable. If that is what you are suggesting, > then consider that I accidentally got it wrong. Yes, you did, you spammed me too on this response. If you refuse to engage a few neurons and act in accordance to the list rules of etiquette, then you will likely be plonked by at least some list participants, if not a lot.