On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 20:36:39 -0700 David Christensen <dpchr...@holgerdanske.com> wrote:
> On 09/09/2016 11:51 AM, Celejar wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 18:57:02 -0700 > > David Christensen <dpchr...@holgerdanske.com> wrote: > > > > ... > > > >> My laptop has 802.11 a/b/g WiFi and Fast Ethernet. Wireless data > >> transfers are slow (~50 Mbps). Wired is twice as fast (100 Mbps); still > >> slow. Newer WiFi (n, ac) should be faster, but only the newest WiFi > >> hardware can match or beat Gigabit. > > > > You get ~50Mbps over a/b/g? 54Mbps is the theoretical maximum, and > > everything I've read says that 20-24Mbps is the real-world maximum. > > > > Celejar > > > > Benchmarking using WiFi (48 Mb/s): > > 2016-09-09 20:18:51 dpchrist@t7400 ~ > $ time dd if=/dev/urandom of=urandom.100M bs=1M count=100 > 100+0 records in > 100+0 records out > 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 12.6709 s, 8.3 MB/s ... > 2016-09-09 20:19:32 dpchrist@t7400 ~ > $ time scp -p urandom.100M samba:. > urandom.100M > > > 100% 100MB 1.5MB/s 01:08 > > real 1m16.023s > user 0m4.548s > sys 0m0.744s > > > So, 1048576900 bytes * 8 bits / byte / 76.024 seconds > > = 110341671 bits/second So assuming that '9' is a typo, as per another message of yours in this thread, your actual throughput is more like 11Mpbs, correct? Celejar
