On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 08:18:17 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +0000, david...@freevolt.org wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Brian wrote: > > >Wheezy is an unsupported distribution, just like hamm, etch, potato etc. > > >Irrespective of whether it was thought to be wonderful in its day it is > > >now moribund apart from LTS. > > > > We seem to have different understandings of what LTS stands for. > > > > Interesting. > > At least remember what the "S" stands for (Brian).
Noted. Also note that support from all those Wheezy users here wasn't exactly rampant. > There are plenty of people still running wheezy, and there will be for > many years to come (long after wheezy LTS is discontinued). If you don't > wish to support it, that's fine -- you can simply not reply. The last bit is excellent advice; I wish someone had been around at the time to advise me. :) I've stopped thinking about Lenny and Potato, too. -- Brian.