On 11/22/2016 9:16 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 09:09:01AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 11/21/2016 12:43 PM, Joe wrote:
While this does not actually constitute automounting, I suggest that it
differs by a single mouse click. And actually, I didn't deduce that
automounting was what the OP wanted,
It is explicitly what I do not want.
I said in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2016/11/msg00838.html :
"...
This has me wondering if the objectionable reaction was *before*
OR *after* having run
gsettings set org.mate.media-handling automount false"
OK, this is just way too confusing and convoluted for me.
Please note the subject line of
...debian-user/2016/11/msg00838.html began "MURPHY'S LAW RULES".
It detailed observations. It noted that system had begun acting
as desired. It obviously implied that I was about to do some
testing to find out why. I did after all ASK if there was a
logging tool that met stated criteria.
[snip]
Intermediary agents to mount file systems on behalf of an end user
generally fall into two categories:
* Automounters.
See above.
* Desktop environment specific tools.
I have stated that I use Mate D.E.
Yet, you seem to be rejecting both of these.
I never said so.