-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:54:07PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
[...] > Eh? How does calling something by the string "wlx00c0ca364bd2" instead > of "wlan0" make it less accessible? Thank you! You just highlighted why I'm not staying for long in that discussion. I'm out. regards - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlhRDU0ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYAUwCaAo1RZumnlFtHNynQ8c7c17ZF N/oAnRPeZ0iEWr1vxx+JFlWJ050g+Xp/ =/Ayf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----