-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 08:54:50PM +0100, Steffen Dettmer wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > >>> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible > >> > >> you can still use sysvinit as init > > I read that trying to use sysvinit causes trouble and several things > depend on systemd at the moment. > > > The shell scripts used by sysvinit are not simpler. More familiar maybe, > > but not simpler. > > Simplicity can very roughly approximated by source code size. > Do you think the systemd implementation of the fsck wrapper > is simpler that "fsck -A"? > > I hope GNU/Linux forks off as soon as systemd integrates an own > kernel (systemk) and its reimplementation of Wayland (systemx) > in one binary image blob, which for technical reasons will > temporarily be called \EFI\BOOT\BOOTx64.EFI, but only until > UEFI BIOS functionalities are fully integrated. Then you can POST > and fsck in parallel, write units that depend on POST (so X won't > start before POST passed! Imagine that!!) to form a clean, simple > and modern-to-the-max system.
C'm on. Calm on. Feeding the flames doesn't help anyone. > SCNR :-) Please, resist. Good, clean arguments. Respect other views. If we manage that on both sides life may be nice. regards - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlh1REYACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYt0ACfewou0ygNmQFs3bhbMcbGYeBd fxsAnjQH0IvFrWpes3m7hev8WjlpQowX =mwug -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
