On Thursday 23 March 2017 22:54:13 Catherine Gramze wrote: > > On Mar 23, 2017, at 6:44 PM, Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thursday 23 March 2017 22:18:53 Catherine Gramze wrote: > >>> Mar 23, 2017, at 2:46 PM, Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote: > >>> > >>> This is of course incorrect. But I doubt that I could refute it > >>> without appearing aggressive again. :-( > >> > >> What part of what I said is incorrect? > > > > Practically all of it. > > If any part of it was actually incorrect, you could and would have pointed > it out. > > You just disagree with my opinion, on the basis of what *you* want Debian > to be, as opposed to the stated principles of Debian.
The stated principles of Debian? "Debian will remain 100% free. We provide the guidelines that we use to determine if a work is free in the document entitled The Debian Free Software Guidelines. *****We promise that the Debian system and all its components will be free according to these guidelines.*****" (my stars) https://www.debian.org/social_contract Anyone who reads this knows that the net-install disc cannot include non-free firmware and that there could be a problem with connecting to the net. > You are perfectly > free to disagree, but do not make a false claim that what I say is > incorrect when it is not. I am not making a false claim. What you said about me and about what I think and believe is incorrect in practically every detail. Stop maligning me and then insisting that you know better than I do what I believe. As for my being free to disagree, then let me disagree and leave me alone now. Lisi