On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 09:38:16 PM Felix Miata wrote: > Actually in the USA that's false, at least WRT a property owner doing his > own work, but state and local governments have been following the federal > government's lead, producing many constitutionally impermissible > regulations for many decades, and getting away with it because of > prohibitive legal and time expense involved in contesting impermissible > regulation.
Explain more, please. Are you saying that the local zoning authorrity can't do things like: * require building permits * require that work be done by licensed (electrical or plumbing contractors) * comply with various building codes If so, in what sense are those impermissible regulations, or, on what basis could they be contested?