On Wed 16 Aug 2017 at 08:28:57 -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 01:09:54 PM Brian wrote: > > The wiki page is at https://wiki.debian.org/Init > > > > On Tue 15 Aug 2017 at 10:07:07 -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > Well, even a vague note on the page something like: > > > > > > "Some of this seems to be out of date with the advent of systemd and its > > > adoption in Debian starting with version n.n (<Toy Story name>). If you > > > can contribute anything more to this story, please do." > > > > > > > > > ...would be a start. > > > > A note is not a bad idea, but is the information on the page really > > outdated, or is it inappropriate because it does not reflect the reality > > in jessie and onwards? As I tried to say in another post in this thread, > > what should the page say and how should it be structured? What should be > > omitted and what be put in. What is the purpose of the page? > > > > Sorry if I gave the impression that Felix Miata should be personally > > responsible for any changes. The point I was trying to make was that > > someone (or a number of someones) has to do it. Take a look at the > > BootProcess page. The link is on the Init page; looking at that page > > in isolation only scratches the surface of the task. > > I was going to go to that page and add something like the note I mentioned, > and then suggest that you (Brian) and others check out that page and make > additional modifications as appropriate. > > But, on going to that page, I see that Greg Wooledge actually modified that > page yesterday at 17:32 (don't know if that is UTC or something else). Thank > you, Greg. > > The entry in the "change log" for his changes says: > > "discuss the alternative init systems a bit, and at least attempt to describe > the current state of affairs" > > It looks good to me (;-) but I really know nothing about what is being > discussed. > > I'd suggest others take a look, and make modifications / additions as > appropriate. > > Thanks again to Greg who took the bull by the horns (and, asfaict, did not > get > gored).
Looks good to me too. Just a few small changes and additions (which hopefully polish it) made. -- Brian.