On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 07:04, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:41:15PM +0000, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > Because there will be lots of people who haven't yet had the chance to
> > upgrade.  They won't thank us for making an exploit available to every 
> > would-be cracker.
> 
> Why should we cater to people who can't be bothered to help
> themselves?  Leaving readily compromisable systems out there does the
> net a disservice.

Suppose I go off for two weeks holiday?  I'm the only one who can change
my system's kernel, but I leave it on because it is the gateway for
everyone else.  The day after I leave, some idiot publishes details of
this exploit and for 13 days my system is vulnerable, before I even hear
about the problem, let alone have the chance to fix it.

There is not yet a Debian package of kernel 2.4.23, so anyone who can't
downgrade to 2.4.18 must fetch his own kernel source and build it; which
may be beyond the abilities of many of those who are vulnerable. 

-- 
Oliver Elphick                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isle of Wight, UK                             http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
                 ========================================
     "What shall we then say to these things? If God be for 
      us, who can be against us?"              Romans 8:31 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to